<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Gillespie Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gillespiegroup.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gillespiegroup.com</link>
	<description>Philadelphia Marketing &#38; Advertising</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:01:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Oscar Race</title>
		<link>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/02/the-oscar-race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/02/the-oscar-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academy awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gillespie group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gillespiegroup.com/?p=1646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The little idea of an Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The little idea of an Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences was born in January 1927, over dinner, at MGM studio chief Louis B. Mayer’s Santa Monica beach house.  The Oscar statuette is now probably the most recognized trophy in the world.  The name Oscar is derived from the original Academy librarian who, upon seeing the trophy for the first time, remarked that it looked like her lovable uncle Oscar.  The name took root and became official in 1939.  And who doesn’t love Oscar?  Actually, a lot of people do not love Oscar.  Just ask the parade of nominees through the years who have received multiple nominations and no Oscar win.<span id="more-1646"></span></p>
<p>Let’s face the fact that no one can agree on what makes a good movie.  If you think that a broad consensus is necessary for a film to receive an Oscar nomination, think again.  The nominating process has a complexity that rivals the judging at the Olympic ice skating competition.  The Academy affirmed its experiment to expand the Best Picture category.  Nine films have been nominated.  This makes for an interesting stew and the potential for a dark horse winner, especially in a very competitive year.  In addition to the intimate, small-scale films that have dominated the Best Picture race in recent years, there is a well-rounded representation including an extensive digital effects film, a biographical sports drama and a silent movie.  A more subtle comparison is how the top nominated films were initially regarded by professional critics upon their theatrical release.  By this informal measure, “The Artist” leads the pack, followed closely by “Hugo”, “Midnight in Paris” and “The Descendants”.</p>
<p>Here is a closer look at who will bring home the top prize and what criteria help determine the winner.  <strong>Praise from critics</strong> is important.  If a film is well received in New York and Los Angeles and wins some critic’s awards, then the film will be a factor.  <strong>Box office</strong> impact is a definable measuring tool.  Rarely does a disappointment at the box office win the top prize.  <strong>Strong acting performances</strong> are essential.  Superior acting is a film’s most identifiable mark of quality.  <strong>Tackling an important theme</strong> instills relevance.  This reinforces the popular opinion that Academy voters are drawn to films with social significance.  <strong>Cachet of a heavyweight director</strong> attracts votes.</p>
<p>The Oscar winner is not always the pinnacle of filmmaking achievement.  The truth is, more often than not, that Academy members, voting as individuals but thinking as a group, award films that will bring honor to the Academy.</p>
<p>So, now you have all the information necessary to correctly pick this year’s winner.  Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/02/the-oscar-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;If you&#8217;ve got a passion for fashion&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/02/if-youve-got-a-passion-for-fashion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/02/if-youve-got-a-passion-for-fashion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideal clothing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vintage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gillespiegroup.com/?p=1472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone know where you can find the TV spot for Ideal?&#8221;...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know where you can find the TV spot for Ideal?&#8221;</p>
<p>I found the audio track on for Ideal on YouTube.</p>
<iframe width="662" height="400" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/oQFlkK9nYYs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<p>Remember the New Jersey retailer that dominated the local air waves with this awesome jingle?  Let me know where I can find this spot.</p>
<p>And, of course, let me know what you think of this awesome ditty!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/02/if-youve-got-a-passion-for-fashion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Oscar Contest</title>
		<link>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/02/2012-oscar-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/02/2012-oscar-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gillespiegroup.com/?p=1632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its that time of the year again, the 84th Annual Academy Awards...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its that time of the year again, the <em>84th Annual Academy Awards</em> are just around the corner and that can only mean one thing.  The <em><strong>2012 Gillespie Group Oscar Contest</strong></em> is here!<span id="more-1632"></span></p>
<p>Check your pick for each nominee. Entry must be received no later than Friday, February 24 by 5:00 PM. Only one entry per person. In the event of a tie, the winner will be drawn at random from all correct entries.</p>
<p>This year we have exciting prizes!</p>
<p>1st Prize:  $50 PrimoHoagies Gift Card</p>
<p>2nd Prize:  $25 Regal Cinemas Gift Card</p>
<p>3rd Prize:  $25 Regal Cinemas Gift Card</p>

		<div id="usermessagea" class="cf_info "></div>
		<form enctype="multipart/form-data" action="/feed/#usermessagea" method="post" class="cform 2012-oscar-contest " id="cformsform">
		<ol class="cf-ol">
			<li id="li--1" class="textonly">Contact Information</li>
			<li id="li--2" class=""><label for="cf_field_2"><span>Name</span></label><input type="text" name="cf_field_2" id="cf_field_2" class="single fldrequired" value=""/><span class="reqtxt">(required)</span></li>
			<li id="li--3" class=""><label for="cf_field_3"><span>Email</span></label><input type="text" name="cf_field_3" id="cf_field_3" class="single fldemail fldrequired" value=""/><span class="emailreqtxt">(valid email required)</span></li>
			<li id="li--4" class="textonly">Oscar Entries</li>
			<li id="li--5" class=""><label for="cf_field_5"><span>Best Picture</span></label><select name="cf_field_5" id="cf_field_5" class="cformselect fldrequired" >
				<option value="The Artist">The Artist</option>
				<option value="The Descendants">The Descendants</option>
				<option value="Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close">Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close</option>
				<option value="The Help">The Help</option>
				<option value="Hugo">Hugo</option>
				<option value="Midnight in Paris">Midnight in Paris</option>
				<option value="Moneyball">Moneyball</option>
				<option value="The Tree of Life">The Tree of Life</option>
				<option value="War Horse">War Horse</option>
			</select><span class="reqtxt">(required)</span></li>
			<li id="li--6" class=""><label for="cf_field_6"><span>Best Director</span></label><select name="cf_field_6" id="cf_field_6" class="cformselect fldrequired" >
				<option value="Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist">Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist</option>
				<option value="Alexander Payne, The Descendants">Alexander Payne, The Descendants</option>
				<option value="Martin Scorsese, Hugo">Martin Scorsese, Hugo</option>
				<option value="Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris">Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris</option>
				<option value="Terence Malick, The Tree of Life">Terence Malick, The Tree of Life</option>
			</select><span class="reqtxt">(required)</span></li>
			<li id="li--7" class=""><label for="cf_field_7"><span>Best Actress</span></label><select name="cf_field_7" id="cf_field_7" class="cformselect fldrequired" >
				<option value="Glenn Close, Albert Nobbs">Glenn Close, Albert Nobbs</option>
				<option value="Viola Davis, The Help">Viola Davis, The Help</option>
				<option value="Rooney Mara, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo">Rooney Mara, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo</option>
				<option value="Meryl Streep, The Iron Lady">Meryl Streep, The Iron Lady</option>
				<option value="Michelle Williams, My Week with Marilyn">Michelle Williams, My Week with Marilyn</option>
			</select><span class="reqtxt">(required)</span></li>
			<li id="li--8" class=""><label for="cf_field_8"><span>Best Actor</span></label><select name="cf_field_8" id="cf_field_8" class="cformselect fldrequired" >
				<option value="Demian Bichir, A Better Life">Demian Bichir, A Better Life</option>
				<option value="George Clooney, The Descendants">George Clooney, The Descendants</option>
				<option value="Jean Dujardin, The Artist">Jean Dujardin, The Artist</option>
				<option value="Gary Oldman, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy">Gary Oldman, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy</option>
				<option value="Brad Pitt, Moneyball">Brad Pitt, Moneyball</option>
			</select><span class="reqtxt">(required)</span></li>
			<li id="li--9" class=""><label for="cf_field_9"><span>Best Supporting Actress</span></label><select name="cf_field_9" id="cf_field_9" class="cformselect fldrequired" >
				<option value="Berenice Bejo, The Artist">Berenice Bejo, The Artist</option>
				<option value="Jessica Chastain, The Help">Jessica Chastain, The Help</option>
				<option value="Melissa McCarthy, Bridesmaids">Melissa McCarthy, Bridesmaids</option>
				<option value="Janet McTeer, Albert Nobbs">Janet McTeer, Albert Nobbs</option>
				<option value="Octavia Spencer, The Help">Octavia Spencer, The Help</option>
			</select><span class="reqtxt">(required)</span></li>
			<li id="li--10" class=""><label for="cf_field_10"><span>Best Supporting Actor</span></label><select name="cf_field_10" id="cf_field_10" class="cformselect fldrequired" >
				<option value="Kenneth Branagh, My Week with Marilyn">Kenneth Branagh, My Week with Marilyn</option>
				<option value="Jonah Hill, Moneyball">Jonah Hill, Moneyball</option>
				<option value="Nick Nolte, Warrior">Nick Nolte, Warrior</option>
				<option value="Christopher Plummer, Beginners">Christopher Plummer, Beginners</option>
				<option value="Max von Sydow, Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close">Max von Sydow, Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close</option>
			</select><span class="reqtxt">(required)</span></li>
			<li id="li--11" class=""><label for="cf_field_11"><span>Best Original Screenplay</span></label><select name="cf_field_11" id="cf_field_11" class="cformselect fldrequired" >
				<option value="Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist">Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist</option>
				<option value="Annie Mumolo and Kristen Wiig, Bridesmaids">Annie Mumolo and Kristen Wiig, Bridesmaids</option>
				<option value="J.C. Chandor, Margin Call">J.C. Chandor, Margin Call</option>
				<option value="Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris">Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris</option>
				<option value="Asghar Farhadi, A Separation">Asghar Farhadi, A Separation</option>
			</select><span class="reqtxt">(required)</span></li>
			<li id="li--12" class=""><label for="cf_field_12"><span>Best Adapted Screenplay</span></label><select name="cf_field_12" id="cf_field_12" class="cformselect fldrequired" >
				<option value="The Descendants">The Descendants</option>
				<option value="Hugo">Hugo</option>
				<option value="The Ides of March">The Ides of March</option>
				<option value="Moneyball">Moneyball</option>
				<option value="Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy">Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy</option>
			</select><span class="reqtxt">(required)</span></li>
			<li id="li--13" class=""><label for="cf_field_13"><span>Best Documentary Feature</span></label><select name="cf_field_13" id="cf_field_13" class="cformselect fldrequired" >
				<option value="Hell and Back Again">Hell and Back Again</option>
				<option value="If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front">If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front</option>
				<option value="Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory">Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory</option>
				<option value="Pina">Pina</option>
				<option value="Undefeated">Undefeated</option>
			</select><span class="reqtxt">(required)</span></li>
			<li id="li--14" class=""><label for="cf_field_14"><span>Best Foreign Language Film</span></label><select name="cf_field_14" id="cf_field_14" class="cformselect fldrequired" >
				<option value="Bullhead, Belgium">Bullhead, Belgium</option>
				<option value="Footnote, Israel">Footnote, Israel</option>
				<option value="In Darkness, Poland">In Darkness, Poland</option>
				<option value="Monsieur Lazhar, Canada">Monsieur Lazhar, Canada</option>
				<option value="A Separation, Iran">A Separation, Iran</option>
			</select><span class="reqtxt">(required)</span></li>
			<li id="li--15" class=""><label for="cf_field_15"><span>Best Animated Feature</span></label><select name="cf_field_15" id="cf_field_15" class="cformselect fldrequired" >
				<option value="A Cat in Paris">A Cat in Paris</option>
				<option value="Chico & Rita">Chico & Rita</option>
				<option value="Kung Fu Panda 2">Kung Fu Panda 2</option>
				<option value="Puss in Boots">Puss in Boots</option>
				<option value="Rango">Rango</option>
			</select><span class="reqtxt">(required)</span></li>
			<li id="li--16" class=""><label for="cforms_q" class="secq"><span>What color is snow?</span></label><input type="text" name="cforms_q" id="cforms_q" class="secinput " value=""/></li>
		</ol>
		<fieldset class="cf_hidden">
			<legend>&nbsp;</legend>
			<input type="hidden" name="cforms_a" id="cforms_a" value="d508fe45cecaf653904a0e774084bb5c"/>
			<input type="hidden" name="cf_working" id="cf_working" value="<span>One%20moment%20please...</span>"/>
			<input type="hidden" name="cf_failure" id="cf_failure" value="<span>Please%20fill%20in%20all%20the%20required%20fields.</span>"/>
			<input type="hidden" name="cf_codeerr" id="cf_codeerr" value="<span>Please%20double-check%20your%20verification%20code.</span>"/>
			<input type="hidden" name="cf_customerr" id="cf_customerr" value="yyy"/>
			<input type="hidden" name="cf_popup" id="cf_popup" value="nn"/>
		</fieldset>
		<p class="cf-sb"><input type="submit" name="sendbutton" id="sendbutton" class="sendbutton" value="Submit" onclick="return cforms_validate('', false)"/></p></form><p class="linklove" id="ll"><a href="http://www.deliciousdays.com/cforms-plugin"><em>cforms</em> contact form by delicious:days</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/02/2012-oscar-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eyes On Impressions</title>
		<link>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/02/eyes-on-impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/02/eyes-on-impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Buying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gillespiegroup.com/?p=1621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year we wrote a little about the new Out of Home...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year we wrote a little about the new Out of Home measuring system called <em>Eyes On</em>. Back then it was still a theory and a nice look into the future. As it happens, the future is now and <em>Eyes On</em> is the currency for the <em>Out of Home</em> (OOH) media measurement.  Eyes On is a better way and it’s now real.</p>
<p>Over the past few decades OOH industry and media planners have used <em>Daily Effective Circulation</em> (DEC) as the primary measurement, which has been based off of traffic counts surrounding specific outdoor boards.  OOH was used as a broad reach vehicle.  Given the DEC measurement, it was almost impossible to demographically target a specific audience.  OOH was purchased via “showings”, typically a #100, #75, #50 and #25.  The showing number represented a percentage reach of the market population.  The number of units/panels required to achieve a specific showing varied by market.  As a way to standardize OOH delivery, The <a title="Traffic audit bureau for media measurment" href="http://www.eyesonratings.com/home.aspx" target="_blank"><em>Traffic Audit Bureau for Media Measurement</em> (TAB)</a>, developed the <em>Eyes On</em> concept as an alternative to the DEC.</p>
<p>TAB developed what they call the four building blocks of <em>Eyes On</em> – Circulation (more accurate traffic counts); Visibility Research (travel simulation eye tracking data that actually converts the number of people passing a display to the audience that actually sees the advertisement); Demographics (Census and trip survey data is used to identify the demographic composition of people passing each display); Reach and Frequency (trip origins and destination information).  The research program was designed to determine the portion of the population who pass an OOH advertisement and actually see it.  It also takes into account how a unit’s format, size, road type/speed, road side, angle to the road and distance to the road effect the likelihood that the advertising will be noticed.</p>
<p>The transition from DEC and showings will take some time to completely comprehend the new metric with many new terms:  CSBA’s, EOI’s, VAI’s, PRS, MAP and many more.   With <em>Eyes On</em> measurement, buying OOH will be more sophisticated, accurate and more in-line with numbers and terms media planners/buyers are more familiar with.</p>
<p>As of January 1, 2012 <em>Eyes On</em> is the currency for the OOH industry and data is now available for the Philadelphia market.  If you would like to hear more about the new metric please feel free to contact your friendly media managers – Debbie, Alena or Holly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/02/eyes-on-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pre-gaming for the Big Game.</title>
		<link>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/02/pre-gaming-for-the-big-game/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/02/pre-gaming-for-the-big-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dodge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volkswagen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gillespiegroup.com/?p=1604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we prepare for the big game this weekend, those of us...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we prepare for the big game this weekend, those of us in advertising will inherently look forward to viewing the newest and most creative spots to come out of the big (and sometimes small) agencies.  With recent advertising prices peaking at 3.1M for a thirty second spot, it is no surprise that agencies will pull out all of the stops in an effort to capture the attention of the viewers and wow them into ongoing discussion of just how great <em>Brand X</em>&#8216;s commercial was.  In the past, these commercials were a tight lipped secret until their time slot on the big night. So why is it, in the past two years, advertisers have not only released their commercials early via social media outlets, but have gone above and beyond to promote their new spots?<span id="more-1604"></span></p>
<p>In some cases, brands have gone above and beyond to create more than the standard :30 or :60 spot, such as the new Honda CR-V spot featuring Matthew Broderick, playing off his classic <em>Ferris Buellers Day Off. </em></p>
<iframe width="662" height="400" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/VhkDdayA4iA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<p>or the Acura NSX commercial featuring Jerry Seinfeld and Jay Leno.</p>
<iframe width="662" height="400" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WUFSHzT2xuY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<p>How about teasing your own TV spot as Volkswagen has done with their &#8220;Imperial March&#8221; performed by a group of barking dogs?  This is a gentle reminder of last years &#8220;Darth Vader&#8221; ad and transitions into their freshly released New Beetle ad, even if just slightly.</p>
<iframe width="662" height="400" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/6ntDYjS0Y3w" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe width="662" height="400" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0-9EYFJ4Clo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<p>So why choose to release a lengthened/shortened version of the spot that you spent millions on through a free social network before the release on your scheduled 3.1M air time?  Is it possible that viewers feel a sense of entitlement the night of the event, and therefore have increased brand loyalty? Is there a hightened sense of anticipation as you await the spot to air? Is it possible that pre-releasing your spot can enhance the viewing experience for the viewer rather then diminish it?</p>
<p>What are your thoughts and if you had the choice, would you release your spot early?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/02/pre-gaming-for-the-big-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood&#8217;s Obsession With Movies Based On Other Movies</title>
		<link>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/01/hollywoods-obsession-with-movies-based-on-other-movies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/01/hollywoods-obsession-with-movies-based-on-other-movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies & Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gillespiegroup.com/?p=1573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four years ago, movie industry reporters and insiders proclaimed that after a...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four years ago, movie industry reporters and insiders proclaimed that after a year of movie sequels, the future film slates from the major studios would be sequel-light.  If the intervening years were intended as a unique opportunity to showcase new ideas and the ingenuity of the creative energy at the studios, then Hollywood is in trouble.</p>
<p><span id="more-1573"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Between April and September of 2011 eighteen sequels, re-issues, remakes and re-boots were released.  That number does not include popular sequels released at year&#8217;s end during the lucrative holiday season: &#8220;Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 1&#8243;, &#8220;Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked&#8221;, &#8220;Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows&#8221;, &#8220;Mission Impossible- Ghost Protocol&#8221; and &#8220;The Muppets&#8221;.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">2011</span></p>
<p>Arthur (2011)</p>
<p>Scream 4</p>
<p>Fast Five</p>
<p>Hoodwinked Too! Hood vs. Evil</p>
<p>Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides</p>
<p>The Hangover Part II</p>
<p>Kung Fu Panda 2</p>
<p>X-Men: First Class</p>
<p>Cars 2</p>
<p>Transformers: Dark of the Moon</p>
<p>Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows Part 2</p>
<p>Rise of the Planet of the Apes</p>
<p>Final Destination 5</p>
<p>Conan the Barbarian (2011)</p>
<p>Fright Night (2011)</p>
<p>Spy Kids: All the Time in the World</p>
<p>The Lion King 3-D</p>
<p>Straw Dogs (2011)</p>
<p>In &#8217;2012 Hollywood&#8217;s obsession with movies based on other movies will continue.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">2012</span></p>
<p>Titanic 3-D</p>
<p>Scary Movie 5</p>
<p>The Avengers (2012)</p>
<p>Men In Black 3-D</p>
<p>Madagascar 3: Europe&#8217;s Most Wanted</p>
<p>G.I. Joe: Retaliation</p>
<p>The Amazing Spider-Man</p>
<p>Ice Age: Continental Drift 3-D</p>
<p>The Dark Knight Rises</p>
<p>Step Up 4</p>
<p>The Bourne Legacy</p>
<p>Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Dog Days</p>
<p>Total Recall (2012)</p>
<p>Sparkle (2012)</p>
<p>The Expendables 2</p>
<p>Finding Nemo 3-D</p>
<p>Resident Evil 5</p>
<p>Savages (2012)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>How long will movie goers be willing to watch the same six or seven movies over and over</p>
<p>again, year after year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/01/hollywoods-obsession-with-movies-based-on-other-movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What was Tab thinking?</title>
		<link>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/01/what-was-tab-thinking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/01/what-was-tab-thinking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 05:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mindsticker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tab cola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vintage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gillespiegroup.com/?p=1470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember Tab? I&#8217;m not a big soda drinker.  But I can remember...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember Tab?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a big soda drinker.  But I can remember my folks consuming this product by the gallon.  It was the early 1970s.  I remember asking my mom, &#8220;Do you like Tab?&#8221;  She said, bluntly, &#8220;No. It&#8217;s pretty bad.&#8221;</p>
<p>Years later, I saw it in the grocery store and bought it for a party I was having. I thought it would be funny.  Kind of a novelty.</p>
<p>Suffice to say, I ended up throwing away the six packs after the party. Apparently everyone else thought it was pretty bad.</p>
<p>A few years ago, I stumbled across this ad for Tab. I think it came out in 1972.  It&#8217;s a classic.  I can&#8217;t believe that it aired.  Or at least, I can&#8217;t believe that network executives didn&#8217;t get an earful from the women&#8217;s lib movement.</p>
<p>Check it out.</p>
<iframe width="662" height="400" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/IJktN8RBB20" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<p>Let me know what you think.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/01/what-was-tab-thinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We love this ad.</title>
		<link>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/01/i-love-this-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/01/i-love-this-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 08:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gillespiegroup.com/?p=1467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You should check out this ad. (DeBeers Dandelion) It&#8217;s for De Beers....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should check out this ad. (<a href="http://www.creativity-online.com/work/debeers-dandelion/6033" target="_blank">DeBeers Dandelion</a>)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s for De Beers. To my knowledge it never ran.  At least I don&#8217;t recall seeing it in this market.  I came across the ad when doing research for a pitch.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the definition of  &#8220;great creative&#8221; is.  But for me this comes close.  It&#8217;s beautifully shot.  It tells a story, visually. Dusty Springfield&#8217;s rendition of &#8220;What Are You Doing The Rest of Your Life&#8221; is spot-on.  The commercial is simple yet powerful.</p>
<p>Let me know what you think about this spot.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/01/i-love-this-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>St. John&#8217;s Hospice</title>
		<link>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/01/st-johns-hospice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/01/st-johns-hospice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[archdiocese of philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic social services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soup kitchen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[st. johns hospice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gillespiegroup.com/?p=1459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the fall, Gillespie Group staff volunteered at St. John&#8217;s Hospice.  Each...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the fall, Gillespie Group staff volunteered at St. John&#8217;s Hospice.  Each day at St. John&#8217;s about 500 homeless men find a hot meal.  Many are able to shower, change their clothing. St. John&#8217;s offers hope and compassion for these men.  And many find their way off the streets and are able to live healthy, addiction-free lives through the work of St. John&#8217;s Hospice.</p>
<p>Gillespie Group staff, including Mike Gillespie, Sr., Gregg Smith, Debbie Field, Alena Minarovicova and Mike Gillespie, Jr. volunteered by serving lunch.  With a limited budget, St. John&#8217;s relies on an army of volunteers and supporters which allows the organization to continue feeding homeless men.</p>
<p>In addition to volunteering to serve meals, people provide clothing and deliver prepared casseroles which are the main meals served to the men.</p>
<p>Learn more about St. John&#8217;s by visiting www.stjohnshospice.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2012/01/st-johns-hospice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google +1 Button</title>
		<link>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2011/12/google-1-button/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2011/12/google-1-button/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alena</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[+1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promoting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gillespiegroup.com/?p=1428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google’s +1 button was introduced in March of 2011 and many people...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1507" title="google+1" src="http://www.gillespiegroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/google+1-300x170.png" alt="" width="300" height="170" />Google’s +1 button was introduced in March of 2011 and many people had doubts about the new social venture of the search giant. But Google had no other choice but to get on the social bandwagon, and brought social and search together into a social search.<span id="more-1428"></span></p>
<p>Google’s +1 button shares many similarities to Facebook’s like, but in the world where over 50% of a website’s traffic comes from Google, the +1 button all of a sudden becomes a powerful tool. Unfortunately, just like with any social phenomenon, it takes a while to reach a significant mass. Nine months later, Google has reached this critical mass and is now integrating +1 button into its search algorithm. The integration into search algorithm brings a whole new level to a developing social venture. As you may know, there are several elements in Google’s algorithm, including inbound and outbound links, fresh content, headers, meta tags and others. With +1, Google now introduced a social component that is going to play a role similar to Google’s quality score in the AdWords Program. Sites will increasingly rely upon +1 button to achieve higher search rankings hence more visitors to their websites. However, in order to achieve that the website content is going to be even more important than ever before, because at the end of the day that is how you’re going to get more +1s.</p>
<p>Bottom line, +1 button isn’t exactly similar to a Facebook “like”; it is a lot more powerful! If you are a business, integrating a +1 button into your website should be on the top of your to do list. With Google’s ever-changing search algorithm, you always have to be ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gillespiegroup.com/2011/12/google-1-button/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

